Peer Review Process

Science, Technology, and Communication Journal (SINTECHCOM) has a policy in the review process:

All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow the focus and scope and the author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarized content. All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software for similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using the Turnitin software.

At least two peer reviewers will review every submitted paper. Reviewers are aware of the author's identity, and the author is also aware of the reviewer's identity (in peer reviews). The reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references.

The Editor will inform you of the review results as soon as possible, ideally within 1-2 months. Please note that, for paper submissions to Science, Technology, and Communication Journal (SINTECHCOM), the review process may take up to 3 months.

The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the Editors based on the reviewers' comments. Publication of accepted articles, including the sequence of published articles, will be made by the Editor in Chief by considering the sequence of accepted dates and the geographical distribution of authors, as well as the thematic issue.