| Main Menu |
| Focus and Scope |
| Editorial Team |
| Peer-Reviewers |
| Peer Review Process |
| Publication Process |
| Open Access Policy |
| Publication Ethics |
| Plagiarism Policy |
| Retraction Policy |
| Copyright Notice |
| Archiving Policy |
| Repository Policy |
| Author Guidelines |
| Article Processing Charges |
| Manuscript Template |
| Download Template |
| Make a Submission |
| Submit Your Paper |
| Information |
| For Readers |
| For Authors |
| For Librarians |
| Publisher |
![]() |
| Collaborate |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Indexed |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Citedness in Web of Science |
![]() |
| Citedness in Scopus |
![]() |
| Visitors |
| Tools |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Indexed in Process |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Retraction Policy
Articles published in Science, Technology, and Communication Journal (SINTECHCOM Journal) will be considered for retraction if:
- There is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to misconduct (e.g., data fabrication) or honest error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental error).
- The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e., cases of redundant publication).
- The article constitutes plagiarism.
- The article reports unethical research.
The retraction mechanism follows the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf


























